Podcasts

Oscar Circuit: Best Cinematography

And the Nominees Are:

Guillaume Schiffman
“The Artist”
Oscar Scene: Waking up from the sound dream sequence

Jeff Cronenweth
“The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo”
Oscar Scene: Opening credits

Robert Richardson
“Hugo”
Oscar Scene: Traveling through the train station

Emmanuel Lubezski
“The Tree of Life”
Oscar Scene: Creation

Janusz Kaminski
“War Horse”
Oscar Scene: Joey running through the battle

This is my favorite technical category of them all.  Being a fan of photography and the illustrious works of some of the great artists that grace the backyard of New Jersey and New York, I can appreciate a beautiful depiction or dimmed sequence of war and love.  The nominees this year have produced some of the greatest images scene in film in a long time.  From simple frame work highlighting the origins of film to a full on blast of trains, nooks and crannies, the auteur that exists within these gentleman are something to marvel at fondly.

Guillaume Schiffman’s work in “The Artist” is probably the core of the charm that everyone speaks of when describing Michel Hazanavicius’ picture.  The film led by a breathtaking cast of Jean Dujardin and Berenice Bejo, accurately captures the essence of a famous film or nickelodeon that would have been seen in the early days of cinema.  Schiffman’s simplicity and honor of the genre has been a force to be reckoned with all season.  With bigger, louder, and more dynamic films coming through the circuit, “The Artist” remains a formidable contender in this category and a possible beneficiary of a sweep.

Jeff Cronenweth, fresh off his deserved nomination for “The Social Network” teamed back up with director David Fincher and painted a dark, demented tone for the American version of “The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo.”  Cronenweth’s style, almost demanding the audience’s attention and showcasing itself as if it were a film from the horror genre, was a match made in cinematic heaven.  A opening sequence to die for with angles and shots only a master could interpret and capture, if the Academy is inclined to do so, could find a consolation prize for this box office success with four other nominations under its belt.

Robert Richardson has been working in the field for decades now.  With an impressive resume and an even better stylistic quality, Richardson and director Martin Scorsese turned “Hugo” into one of, if not the finest, 3-D experience seen on film thus far.  Rather than going after cheap limericks and camera tricks, Richardson devoted himself and the camera to a golden tone that smoothly enriches a train station that might otherwise look unsightly in person, and turn it into a stunning blockade of stone and metal.  Richardson has found himself at Oscar’s podium before with his terrific works in “JFK” by Oliver Stone and Scorsese’s “The Aviator,” Richardson shows no sign of coming up for air anytime soon.  With eleven nominations, eight of which in the technical fields, “Hugo” has huge chances of becoming one of, if not, the most rewarded film of the night without winning Best Picture.  If Oscar wants to embrace the man and team that redefined the 3-D genre, Richardson could find himself ahead of his competition.

Emmanuel Lubezski, criminally ignored for his work in Alfonso Cuaron’s “Children of Men,” comes back bigger and better every time.  Lubezski has seen the nominations come and go over the years with his deserved citations for “Sleepy Hollow” and “The New World.”  Unbeknownst to me, Lubezski remains one of the unrewarded artists of our generation.  His lesser works are still among some of the best performed in the given year.  In the uneven “Ali,” Lubezski turned typical boxing matches into full fledged bloodbaths.  And who could forget his work in “Y Tu Mama Tambien,” a cinematic masterpiece of its own accord that didn’t break through the circuit and remains simply a nominee for Original Screenplay.  Whatever you think of Terrence Malick’s “The Tree of Life,” there’s a hat that can be tipped to its director of photography.  Can you deny the overwhelming beauty that engulfs the screen as we watch the birth of our existence?  Or the introduction of a baby sibling to his older-toddler brother as he looks with mystery and confusion?  Lubezski’s win with the Cinematographers Guild will hopefully solidify his Oscar but he did win the same award and looked like a shoo-in for “Children of Men.”  Five nominations is enough, an Oscar is in order, don’t you think?

Janusz Kaminski is one of the most seasoned and influential cameramen to grace our screens.  When Spielberg attached him to his passion project “Schindler’s List,” the world was introduced to a different kind of experience.  Kaminski’s use of framing and placing the audience in a first-person view of epic proportions is among the best techniques in the business.  While “War Horse” contains a jagged story that some found both moving and long winded, the technical aspects of the film solely carried the film to the latter part of the season to make it a nominee.  While it’s not as brilliant as his works in “The Diving Bell and the Butterfly” and “Saving Private Ryan,” Kaminski can hold his head up high as still one of the biggest dogs in the industry.

Predicted: Emmanuel Lubezski for “The Tree of Life”

Snubbed: Drive, Moneyball, Melancholia

Clayton Davis is the respected and esteemed AwardsCircuit.com editor. Clayton has become a proud member of the Broadcast Film Critics Association where he votes and attends the kick off to awards season show, The Critics Choice Movie Awards. Most recently, Clayton is a now an active member of the International Press Academy, which hosts the popular Satellite Awards as well as the newly integrated Broadcast Television Journalists Association, which hosts the Critics Choice Television Awards.

5 Comments

  1. Josh P.

    February 23, 2012 at 2:03 am

    This is a really interesting category, one of the few that could go the way of any nominee. While I would love to see Lubezki with an Oscar, there’s just some part of me that remains skeptical they’ll give it to him. Mainly it’s because we’ve been down this road before with “Children of Men”, superior work than “The Tree of Life” in my opinion, and he still lost to flashier work. Then there’s somebody like Roger Deakins, who couldn’t win for a movie that had all the right ingredients to win in this category, although many argue “True Grit” was not his best work either. Maybe being “due” and doing great work will translate into a win for him, but history has shown that the sympathy vote doesn’t work in the below-the-line categories (not that Lubezki did work that is to be pitied). Right now, I’m predicting Hugo winning.

    Personally, I would vote for Cronenweth, but a very close second is Lubezki. I hope I’m wrong on who I think will win.

      (Quote)  (Reply)

  2. JDTSEK

    February 23, 2012 at 4:08 am

    Agree fully on the snub for Melancholia. I’m honestly really torn between naming it or Tree of Life my best cinematography of the year.

      (Quote)  (Reply)

  3. Joey Magidson

    February 23, 2012 at 5:59 am

    I’m going the same route as you boss…but I could see it going any number of ways.

      (Quote)  (Reply)

  4. Robert Hamer

    February 23, 2012 at 6:30 am

    Uh oh, I noticed a typo. You put down “Creation” instead of “EVERY SCENE.”

      (Quote)  (Reply)

  5. Rutledal

    February 23, 2012 at 7:45 pm

    Lubezski needs to win this, I mean The Tree of Life wasn’t my cup of tea, but I can’t think of a more deserving winner since The Assassination of Jesse James, which of course was snubbed.

      (Quote)  (Reply)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


+ 5 = six

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>



UA-17272164-1