Join in! Listen to our Weekly Podcast Episodes

Click Here To View Our Podcast Channel

  • Ben Affleck further hints at how experimental “To The Wonder” is…

    Also, did Terence Malick cut Affleck's screen time in the film?

    September 1, 2012

    We’re very close to getting the first reviews of Terrence Malick’s film ‘To The Wonder’, but some interesting hints/innuendo are leaking out about the flick. We’d already heard months ago how the movie is supposedly even more experimental than ‘The Tree of Life,’ but now Ben Affleck himself has supposedly told the same to Jeff Wells over at Hollywood Elsewhere, which he took to Twitter to pass along. You can see his tweets on the subject after the jump, along with a very detailed synopsis from Venice on the flick. Tread lightly with the latter, but then again…who knows, since it’s Malick. Read on below for more…

    Here’s the Tweets Jeff Wells sent out:

    Hollywood Elsewhere ‏@wellshwood
    Ben Affleck at Telluride picnic: Terrence Malick’s “To The Wonder,” in which he stars, “makes ‘Tree of Life’ look like ‘Transformers.’”

    Affleck didn’t say this, but I’m told he’s barely in “To The Wonder” a la Adrien Brody in “Thin Red Line” and Sean Penn in “Tree of Life”

    And here’s the synopsis:

    TO THE WONDER, written and directed by Terrence Malick, is a romantic drama centered on Neil, a man who is torn between two loves: Marina, the European woman who came to United States to be with him, and Jane, the old flame he reconnects with from his hometown. In TO THE WONDER, Malick explores how love and its many phases and seasons – passion, sympathy, obligation, sorrow, indecision – can transform, destroy, and reinvent lives.

    As TO THE WONDER opens, Neil and Marina are together on the French island of Mont St. Michel – known in France as The Wonder of the Western World (Merveille de l’Occident) – and invigorated by feelings of being newly in love. Neil, an aspiring writer, has left the United States in search of a better life, leaving behind a string of unhappy affairs. Looking into Marina’s eyes as the Abbey looms in the distance, Neil is certain he has finally found the one woman he can love with commitment. He makes a vow to be true to this woman alone.

    Marina, quiet and beautiful, with flashes of a mischievous humor, is divorced and the mother of a 10-year-old daughter, Tatiana. At 16, Marina left the Ukraine for Paris without a cent to her name. There, she married a Frenchman who abandoned her after just two years, leaving her alone with Tatiana in a studio apartment. Marina was forced to work a variety of temporary jobs to make her way. Having nearly given up hope, Marina is overcome with joy to be in love with Neil, her salvation from an unhappy future.

    Two years later, Neil and Marina are living in a small town in Oklahoma, close to where Neil grew up. Neil, having given up his hopes of becoming a writer, has taken a job as an environmental inspector. Neil is happy with his work, but his love for Marina cools as she, for her part, is frustrated by the holding pattern she feels she is in with Neil. She fears her youth – and happiness – are slipping away. In spite of her anxieties about Neil, Marina initially feels at home in Oklahoma, embraced by the open space and sky, and soothed by the sounds that come from the wind harp that animates breezes into songs.

    Seeking advice, Marina turns to another exile in the community, a Catholic priest named Quintana. We learn that Father Quintana has come to grapple with his own dilemmas, as he harbors doubts about his vocation. He no longer feels the ardor he knew in the first days of his faith, and wonders if he ever will again.

    Professional life throws Neil into conflict as well, when he discovers that a smelting operation in town is polluting the soil and water and threatening the health of future generations. His concerns fail to persuade his neighbors, who depend on the smelter for their livelihoods. Under pressure to keep quiet, Neil must once again weigh the consequences of his actions.

    Neil’s doubts about Marina intensify. This, coupled with the fact that Marina’s visa is soon to expire, leads her to return to France with her daughter. In her absence, Neil reconnects with Jane, an old friend. As the two of them fall deeply in love, Neil finds this new relationship far less complicated. Yet when word comes to him that Marina has fallen on hard times and her daughter has gone to live with her father and refuses to have anything more to do with her, he finds himself gripped by a sense of responsibility for her wellbeing, and arranges for her return to the United States.

    Neil’s entanglements with the two women in his life, and Father Quintana’s struggle with his faith, force them both to consider different kinds of love. Should the commitment they each made be undertaken as a duty, sometimes full of effort? Or should we accept that love often changes, and doesn’t always last? Can sorrow bind lovers more tightly than joy?

    -Thoughts? Discuss in the comments!

    About Joey Magidson


    When he’s not obsessing over new Oscar predictions on a weekly basis, Joey is seeing between 200 and 300 movies a year. He views the best in order to properly analyze the awards race/season each year, but he also watches the worst for reasons he mostly sums up as "so you all don't have to". In his spare time, you can usually find him complaining about the Jets or the Mets. Still, he lives and dies by film. Joey's a voting member of the Internet Film Critics Association as well. Today the IFCA, tomorrow the world!

    Related Stories:

    12 Comments

    1. It was announced recently as well that Rachel Weiz and a slew of other actors were cut out. I mean, it’s Malick, I’ll never forget I think it was last year or one year when Clooney was nominated and the Hollywood Reporter had their round table, and Clooney himself came with his own skepticism about Malick’s ways of cutting actors out of films, mostly defending Adrien Brody. I have my own reservations about the subject, but who knows at this point what will it do to the actual film.

        (Quote)  (Reply)

      share

       

    2. We’ll know soon enough it seems…

        (Quote)  (Reply)

      share

       

    3. I don’t exactly see how Affleck’s role could be cut down. He’s Neil, and Neil gets mentioned directly an awful lot in that synopsis. But, then again, Malick…

        (Quote)  (Reply)

      share

       

    4. I’m skeptical that it’s true, but one never knows with Malick…

        (Quote)  (Reply)

      share

       

    5. I appreciate the visuals in Malick’s movies and the moxy he has to take on certain subjects and film them the way he wants but in terms of just sitting down and enjoying a movie, I’m not much of a fan. I never care about his characters and I feel so distant from the story that he’s telling. I don’t like when there is more voiceover than dialogue between characters in a film.

        (Quote)  (Reply)

      share

       

    6. I really wish I could go to Venice, my two most anticipated films of Oscar season are being shown. The Master and To the Wonder both sound incredible.

        (Quote)  (Reply)

      share

       

    7. Jeremy- I’m similar with him.

        (Quote)  (Reply)

      share

       

    8. George- You’ll see them soon enough…

        (Quote)  (Reply)

      share

       

    9. If Ben’s screen time has been cut down, it seems the film’s story will be told from the two women’s perspectives. Hmm very interesting.

        (Quote)  (Reply)

      share

       

    10. So experimental is a problem for academy voters?

        (Quote)  (Reply)

      share

       

    11. Massimo- I can confirm that that is the case here…

        (Quote)  (Reply)

      share

       

    12. Jessie- Almost all of the time, yes…

        (Quote)  (Reply)

      share

       


    Comments RSS

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


    8 + = fourteen

    You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>



    © Copyright 2008-2012 AwardsCircuit.com - All rights reserved.


    Disclaimer: AwardsCircuit.com is a private, independently owned site which is intended only as entertainment. The views expressed on this website may or may not reflect those of its owner.