Craig Kennedy of Living in Cinema along with my staff and other followers joined in a conversation with me about some films we are not expecting. It happens every year. We think we have nailed down the categories to about five, six, or seven films and/or performances that could fill the potential lineup. Oscar nomination morning rolls around and the President of the Academy along with Forest Whitaker or Anne Hathaway or Jennifer Lawrence come out and say it:
“The Reader, nominees to be determined.” – Whitaker
“The Blind Side, nominees to be determined.” – Hathaway
“and…Extremely Loud and Incredibly Close, Scott Rudin, producer.”
I call these the “WTF?! Nominations” that come time and time again. With so many presumed locks in so many categories, especially in Best Picture, I think this year, we are due for one. The wildcard in all of this is the voting deadline that was implemented this year. We have no idea how this is going to affect the race. We either could have voters going the default, boring and predictable route for their choices or we could get some inventive and bizarre nominations. As AMPAS has evolved in these later years, past films that have peaked their heads out on Oscar nomination morning in Best Picture have been some of the following:
When everything and everyone was saying Dreamgirls, and what looked like it was down for the count, Clint Eastwood proved his magic over the Academy when his Japanese interpretation of the battle of Iwo Jima during World War II made its mark with not only a Best Picture nomination but a matching director bid to boot. Letters from Iwo Jima was much better received than its American predecessor Flags of our Fathers but the Dreamgirls snub was more of the surprise.- During his directorial hiccups in the mid-2000′s, Steven Spielberg’s Munich wasn’t universally praised by all the top critics. While not having reviews that were exponentially better, many assumed that James Mangold’s Walk the Line had the fire power to go the distance especially since co-leads Joaquin Phoenix and Reese Witherspoon were making their strong marks during awards season.
- The Weinsteins have never proven to be more influential than when they were able to convince critics and voters that Lasse Hallstrom’s Chocolat was a superior film then both Cameron Crowe’s Almost Famous and Joel Coen and Ethan Coen’s O Brother, Where Art Thou? (2000). Capturing the lone director spot, Stephen Daldry’s Billy Elliot was more up their alley for Picture recognition. And since we’re on the subject, they were also able to push Juliette Binoche in a Best Actress lineup over the impeccable Bjork in Dancer in the Dark.
- Another Weinstein caused casualty, and ironic enough, another Lasse Hallstrom picture, The Cider House Rules pulled into the station at the last-minute over Paul Thomas Anderson’s Magnolia, Spike Jonze’s Being John Malkovich, and Anthony Minghella’s The Talented Mr. Ripley. I just don’t know how they do it.
The criteria for a film to be considered “WTF?” can have one or many of the following traits:
- The film usually has a pre-November release date.
- The film in question has to have an aura of “come and gone” reaction from the majority of pundits and audiences. You can’t be surprised if it was on your radar.
- On all the major pundit websites, there should be only at most one pundit who could foresee this nomination coming.
- The film usually has a lackluster score on Rotten Tomatoes, Metacritic, and other review gathering outlets.
- Fanboys usually hate the film. They’re vocal about it and they constantly comment on anything that has to do with the film just to say how bad the film is.
- When the film makes it, something that seems FAR more deserving often misses. (Examples: The Dark Knight)
- The films often have some type of historical significance, are a “true” story, or is a great literary adaptation.
And here we are. A few days from the unveiling of the Oscar nominations and we’re trying to see what we missed. What film has a mute power over the Academy that’s going to make our jaws drop? The phenomenon does skip a few years as we’ve seen in the 2000′s and something like Paul Thomas Anderson’s The Master making the Best Picture lineup doesn’t really qualify though many would be surprised. Attempting to compile projections I had to turn to my own Oscar Predictions page for Best Motion Picture and look at the far right column called “Also In Contention,” a section for the low-buzzed films that are ranked numbers 21 through 40.
Joe Wright’s Anna Karenina (Focus Features)
The film is barely certified fresh on Rotten Tomatoes and even the ones that like, some would agree, its not THAT good to be a Best Picture nominee. Many have praised the ambition of Joe Wright in developing the film on a stage but in the same vein, pan the director for leaving the scenery. While a mention of Keira Knightley would certainly surprise many viewers, like Joseph Braverman wrote in a recent article about the power of the British voting bloc, they do tend to stick together, even though its a Russian novelist. Guess it’s more of a Europe thing than British. Consequently many think that group will gravitate towards Sam Mendes’ Skyfall or John Madden’s The Best Exotic Marigold Hotel, don’t be surprised if a period piece walks across that screen.
Gus Van Sant’s Promised Land (Focus Features)
When it was announced as a late entry during the summer, many assumed Gus Van Sant and the writing trio of Matt Damon, John Krasinski, and Dave Eggers were ones to watch out for a la Clint Eastwood when he entered Million Dollar Baby (2004) into the fray. While the picture sits at 50% on Rotten Tomatoes, Van Sant is a well-liked director and very respected among his peers. It also helps that Promised Land was one of the last films to hit theaters before their ballots were due. That’s one reason why the 47% driven film Extremely Loud & Incredibly Close made it.
Sacha Gervasi’s Hitchcock (Fox Searchlight Pictures)
Another late entry in the race this year, no film left more critics and audiences wanting more than Gervasi’s Hitchcock. While leading lady Helen Mirren remains a strong possibility in Lead Actress, there’s no reason those same fans that put her at #1 won’t feel inclined to go with Britain’s Golden God of Directors Alfred Hitchcock and reward the film adaptation of the making of his masterpiece. Of all the characteristics listed for a “WTF?” moment, Hitchcock meets most of those traits especially if it was at the expense of fanboy-loving Django Unchained and/or Beasts of the Southern Wild.
Peter Jackson’s The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey (Warner Bros. Pictures)
Warner Bros. worked exceedingly hard on all their campaigns this year. A lot of money was put into their lead pony Argo from Ben Affleck and found room in their pockets to give Christopher Nolan’s The Dark Knight Rises and the Matthew McConaughey hopeful Magic Mike a proper push. Besides Cloud Atlas which was box office disappointment, the entire Lord of the Rings world and Peter Jackson love fest are very familiar to Oscar voters. The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King is tied as the most rewarded film in Oscar history, they’ve gone for all the films in Best Picture, and the film “elevated” filmmaking with 48 frames per second and some pretty intense action scenes. If those Lord of the Rings fans, also known as Mark Johnson minions, are still alive and well and loving every minute of Middle Earth, 5% to be exact, we could in for some unexpected love for the prequel.
Anything from the Weinstein Company
What’s an Oscar year without the Weinsteins manipulating the system and brainwashing voters into thinking that a certain film is the best film of the year. Outside of Django Unchained, The Master, and their pony Silver Linings Playbook, the company has also been giving some attention to France’s foreign language film entry The Intouchables which received positive reviews from critics and has the potential to show up in areas like Original Screenplay. The Brits could come to the aid of Dustin Hoffman’s Quartet which is penned by Oscar-winning writer Ronald Harwood and a two-time Oscar-winning actor turned director. Don’t ever count them out especially in the Oscar game.
We’re almost there folks! Many are thinking we are going to have a year of ten, which seems sound since the year was so exceptional but it’s felt near impossible to feel the pulse of the season. Many would throw a film like J.A. Bayona’s The Impossible as a Best Picture surprise but I don’t share that surprise if it happens. From the moment I saw the film, it’s felt like something an emotional Academy member that saw the film over Christmas break could easily throw love towards.
Include some of your theories in the comment section and some of your favorite (or hated) “WTF?” moments from Oscar morning!
Related Stories:
42 Comments













How does Letters From Iwo Jima count as a WTF, exactly? It achieved wide critical acclaim and many consider it one of the best films of 2006.
UBourgeois(Quote) (Reply)
I’m not saying Letters from Iwo Jima wasn’t deserved but I remember thinking it would miss, ESPECIALLY in favor of Dreamgirls.
Clayton Davis(Quote) (Reply)
I was ecstatic that Dreamgirls missed. I had been calling it all season, and I hated that movie to boot. 2006 was a killer year, and the lineup all deserved the nods, IMO. The only movie I would have subbed in would have been Pan’s Labyrinth for Babel (which I also didn’t care for).
Dan(Quote) (Reply)
It’ll be Sally Field-Lincoln this year for me.
Recently, Bridesmaids for screenplay, Maggie Gyllenhaal, Blind Side.
Jack(Quote) (Reply)
“Anything from teh Weinstein Company”
Made me laugh so hard!!!
Kofi(Quote) (Reply)
Flight
Just Guessing(Quote) (Reply)
That’s a very good thought. I’d be genuinely surprised by that inclusion.
Clayton Davis(Quote) (Reply)
Exactly why I think Denzel Washington will definitely get nominated for Best Leading Actor…at the expense of Hugh Jackman.
Divya(Quote) (Reply)
Which would be a travesty. Hugh Jackman deserves that statue for simply giving the best performance of the year. He became Jean Val Jean with three different faces and bodies over a 30 year span.
DDL was great at being DDL being Lincoln and Denzel was excellent as this year’s great job at being an addict in a bad movie.
Jamie(Quote) (Reply)
I agree that Flight was bad. Denzel wasn’t bad, but not Oscar worthy. He wont be nominated. And Jackman, from an acting prespective, did alright. He was a disaster with his singing, which is a shame, because i’ve seen him do Oklahoma and other broadway shows and he was PHENOMANAL(Sp?). I don’t know if it was simply a poor directing choice with his singing. I can’t imagine he sings as poorly as he did in Les Mis willingly. Ultimately, he is in the same boat as Washington, decent actor in a bad movie. I don’t think either deserve to be nominated :/
Phill(Quote) (Reply)
Clayton, since when Leo Tolstoy is British?
Daniel B.(Quote) (Reply)
Never said he was. Just pointing out where the British votes may go.
Clayton Davis(Quote) (Reply)
Well, you did write “an adaptation of one of Britain’s greatest literary works.”
I don’t really see the British bloc coming through for Wright’s film, I must say — it hasn’t been popular at all here, and I think many may have forgotten it, given that its UK release was at the start of September.
Interesting article, though. I think the film to look out for may be The Intouchables.
Guy Lodge(Quote) (Reply)
Oops. Saw the mistake, made the correction.
I have a sneaking feeling about The Intouchables.
Clayton Davis(Quote) (Reply)
Cloud Atlas
The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey
I’ve had a creeping suspicion that one of these two may make the cut. I also have a feeling that this year will be an odd year for winners, with many upsets and unexpected victories.
Or I’m probably wrong. The last 3 years have been extremely predictable. I’m ready for some crazy results, even if I hate them.
Ethan Wasdovitch(Quote) (Reply)
Which is why I get the feeling Anne Hathaway might not win Supporting Actress even though the whole world and its sister is predicting her to win. I won’t be surprised if Sally Field wins Supporting Actress, and truth be told, I won’t mind it one bit.
Divya(Quote) (Reply)
that would be awesome… Though the hobbit is sitting at the lower end of my top 10 list, I still haven’t seen some high profile movies.
moviewatcher(Quote) (Reply)
I’d love to see CLOUD ATLAS as this year’s “WTF” Best Picture nominee. I loved that movie, despite all of its perceived flaws.
Rico(Quote) (Reply)
Since the Academy is so fond of historic period films, I would definitely put my money on Anna Karenina. Also, ‘The Hobbit’ should not be ruled out because of the whole ‘Lord of the Rings’ connection. But this is completely left field. By the way, ‘The Reader’ was NOT a WTF nomination. Remember Ricky Gervais’ joke about Holocaust films…also, if there were six slots for Best Pic that year, The Dark Knight would’ve definitely got through.
IIRC, Clayton, last year, EL&IC was included as a Best Pic nominee by your own BFCA itself (so are you slamming your own organization for making a WTF prediction come true?). And historically speaking, the BFCA (more often than not) gets its Best Pic nominees bang on. And last year, at the eleventh hour, even Scott Feinberg had predicted a Oscar BP nod for EL&IC.
But this time, I can’t think of even a single film which will be a WTF nomination. The films that will be nominated have chosen themselves based on their performances in the ‘precursors’. 9 films are completely confirmed IMO, the 10th film will be The Master/The Impossible. And none of those 10 films are WTF by any stretch of imagination.
WTF nominations will appear for acting and screenplay, rather than Best Pic IMO.
Divya(Quote) (Reply)
I don´t think there will be a WTF nomination this year…Which one would really piss you off?
My most wtf hated moments include The Blind Side,Extremely Loud…AND War Horse, although it was not a WTF? moment…it was more like a “Shit” moment
Thomas(Quote) (Reply)
Honestly any Weinstein movie would make me say WTF? if it got nominated for picture (Silver Linings notwithstanding). The Master would surprise me greatly and Django Unchained would surprise me even more, even with all of its internet fanboys and strong box office. Killing Them Softly would be absolutely insane as well. Looks like the Weinsteins bet on a lot of wrong horses this year…
George(Quote) (Reply)
I have to say, The Cider House Rules is one of my favorite films of all time, so I’m pretty happy about that Best Picture nom…and I wasn’t surprised at all for the nominations for Munich either. As for this year, I’d love to see Cloud Atlas make in.
missionstatement1224(Quote) (Reply)
I would absolutely love it if Anna Karenina or Cloud Atlas somehow made the cut.
NeverTooEarlyMP(Quote) (Reply)
I am hoping that “The Perks Of Being A Wallflower” surprises in the Adapted Screenplay and Best Picture categories. I haven’t seen such an honest portrayal of adolescence on screen in years, and it’s been criminally overlooked so far. IMHO it’s a far superior film than “Juno” which was a “teen film” that was able to make the cut with only 5 nominees. I’m praying!
Evan(Quote) (Reply)
7 movies which are not considered as nominees at this moment, but be presented on Thursday next week:
– Anna Karenina
– Cloud Atlas
– Best Exotic Marigold Hotel
– The Impossible
– Dark Knight Rises
– Amour
– Hitchcock
Minimum 1 or 2 movies can make the line, if we’ll have 10 nominees in BP category.
What do You think, who can be the biggest surprise in acting nominees? Keira Knightly, Jean Louis-Trintignant, Javier Bardem, Bill Murray..?
Genadijus(Quote) (Reply)
and more. I have a feeling that Weisteins will be luck ones again. All three movies will appear among BP nominees (The Master, SLP & Django), a buch of acting nominees, and a least 2 directors out of 3 movies. I’m 80% sure.
Genadijus(Quote) (Reply)
I couldnt agree more. I think all 3 get picture and I think that 2 will get director.
Phill(Quote) (Reply)
Dennis Levant for Best Actor? It wouldn’t be THAT shocking, but I have this gut feeling he might be the “Damien Bichir” slot.
koook160 (Robert MacFarlane)(Quote) (Reply)
Am I the only one thinking that Hyde park on Hudson is the obvious choice?
jose montero(Quote) (Reply)
Hmm, I would love to see Denis Lavant among the nominees as well, but it’s absolutely not Oscar-type performance. “A Better Life” was typical Oscar movies (just smaller budget), but with clearly defined subject and real characters. “Holy Motors” is far more difficult choice for the Academy.
Genadijus(Quote) (Reply)
I meant more like an “out-of-left-field” slot.
koook160 (Robert MacFarlane)(Quote) (Reply)
Magic Mike, maybe?
JamDenTel(Quote) (Reply)
If Matthew McConaughey snuck into Best Supporting Actor I would love it.
UBourgeois(Quote) (Reply)
It’s actually crazy how crowded the best actor race is. I don’t think Denis will make it in, but I could see Richard Gere pushing through.
I also don’t think there will be a best picture surprise. I think the place the most surprises will be found is in the supporting acting categories. Specifically Best Supporting Actor. That category is such a clusterfuk I think anything could happen. Will the Django guys be showered with love? Eddie Redmayne?
But for MY MONEy, I STILL think Ewan McGregor could (and should) get love for The Impossible. So that’s my surprise guess.
McGregor(Quote) (Reply)
That fifth spot in the Best Supporting Actor race could lead to an interesting choice for sure. I don’t have the guts to predict him, but I have a feeling somebody like Sam Rockwell for “Seven Psychopaths” could sneak in. He does great work in the film and never nominated before, and it feels like they would want to reward him for that. That would seemingly come out of nowhere and definitely would be surprising.
Josh P.(Quote) (Reply)
your guess is as good as mine,maybe SKYFALL. if this happens,this will be the first james bond movie in over 50 years ever to finally get a best picture nod.
randall gerber(Quote) (Reply)
I would dearly love to see The Hobbit get in there. Even more would love Weinstein to settle for promoting the positive about their own films rather than trying to run roughshod over the competition … even better a year without Weinstein.
Jamie(Quote) (Reply)
I remember that moment last year when they announced the BP nominees. It was coming up so nicely… I was on my earphones tying to guess the next nominee. And by the time the second row filled up, I KNEW there would be eight. I guessed Hugo and I took off my earphones. I said to a friend of mine sitting next to me: “Eight for best picture”
And then the feed started to play back. I’d missed the supporting actor nominations so I was catching up. Max von Sydow? Wow, that’s suprising. And it just kept on going and then it reached Best picture again: ““and…Extremely Loud and Incredibly Close.”
WHAAAAAAAAT? That was a true WTF moment…
moviewatcher(Quote) (Reply)
Still not sure how everyone was surprised about EL&IC. Daldry is one of the few people who they nominate for every film in some category. He could probably make a Hitler biopic where he’s just a funny and charming fellow and he’d get a nomination. He didn’t make Director so Picture was the only other option. If he and the Weinsteins got The Reader into Picture…anything can be done.
steve(Quote) (Reply)
Any nods for a Stephen Daldry film that wasn’t Billy Elliot is a WTF to me.
Colin Biggs(Quote) (Reply)
The Hours was a great film and really deserved all its nominations, but yes EL&IC was not a very good movie.
Roberto Hevia(Quote) (Reply)
Weisteins will nail 3 BP nods this year. I think that will cause some people to say WTF? I’ve been calling it all season. I’ll happily sit back and watch them announce Django, The Master, and Silver Linings. All 3, top 10 of the year for sure.
Phill(Quote) (Reply)