Join in! Listen to our Weekly Podcast Episodes

Click Here To View Our Podcast Channel

  • The Alternate Oscar Nominations!

    What might have been next in line for nominations in the major categories?

    January 17, 2013

    2012-oscar-nominations-seth-macfarlane-emma-stone-best-picturesFor those who don’t follow or don’t remember, in Best Picture I’ll be looking at essentially what the next 10 films could have been for the Academy. It’s partially just for fun (and keep in mind…this isn’t how I would have preferred things to have gone, or else the lists below would be quite different), but I’ve always felt that it also shines an interesting light on what the Oscar nominations could have looked like…for better or worse. Some of these choices are rather obvious, while others are just guesses. Either way, this is nothing if not a good conversation starter, so be sure to let me know what you think the Alternate nominations would have been like. For now though, let’s get started and see what the next level down of Oscar nominees would look like!

    Best Picture

    Anna Karenina
    The Best Exotic Marigold Hotel
    Flight
    Hitchcock
    The Impossible
    The Master
    Moonrise Kingdom
    The Sessions
    Skyfall
    Ted

    -While I have a feeling that not a lot of flicks got anywhere close to that #10 spot, I think ‘Flight’, ‘The Master’, and ‘Skyfall’ came the closest. ‘The Best Exotic Marigold Hotel’ and ‘Hitchcock’ probably got more votes than they potentially deserved, but the limb I’m out on here is that ‘Ted’ had more fans than we ever realized.

    Best Director

    Ben Affleck- Argo
    Kathryn Bigelow- Zero Dark Thirty
    Tom Hooper- Les Miserables
    Quentin Tarantino- Django Unchained
    Robert Zemeckis- Flight

    -Four of these snubs are rather obvious (regardless of my feelings on Hooper’s direction), but something tells me that Zemeckis got closer to sneaking in here than we’d expect, and would have been in if ‘Flight’ had scored a Best Picture nod. Still, I don’t want to focus too much on this category, since Affleck and Bigelow’s omissions are still rather bothersome. This grouping would have been a superior one to what we got (not that they were bad, just those two main snubs are so egregious), even with Hooper stinking things up for me.

    Best Actor

    Jack Black- Bernie
    Richard Gere- Arbitrage
    John Hawkes- The Sessions
    Anthony Hopkins- Hitchcock
    Jean-Louis Tringnant- Amour

    -We knew that someone had to go from Best Actor, and Hawkes wound up being the odd man out, so he’s the obvious number six. With all the ‘Amour’ love, Tringnant probably was next in line, with Gere and Hopkins further down. This was a very strong category, so I’d hardly complain about the original lineup.

    Best Actress

    Marion Cotillard- Rust and Bone
    Keira Knightley- Anna Karenina
    Helen Mirren- Hitchock
    Rachel Weisz- The Deep Blue Sea
    Mary Elizabeth Winstead- Smashed

    -Cotillard and Mirren were almost undoubtedly next in line for nominations, with Weisz not too far behind. Assuming that ‘Anna Karenina’ was more than just a hit with the tech voters, Knightley probably was high up in the conversation too. As for Winstead, well…one can dream, right?

    Best Supporting Actor

    Javier Bardem- Skyfall
    Leonardo DiCaprio- Django Unchained
    John Goodman- Argo
    Dwight Henry- Beasts of the Southern Wild
    Matthew McConaughey- Magic Mike

    -This easily could have wound up as the nominated five in a slightly alternate universe (something I could have said about Best Director too). DiCaprio and possibly Henry were next in line, though Bardem was probably pretty close as well. I’m not at all confident in how lose McCounaughey got to a nomination, but I think we was likely in the top eight or nine, so he makes sense here.

    Best Supporting Actress

    Ann Dowd- Compliance
    Nicole Kidman- The Paperboy
    Kelly Reilly- Flight
    Maggie Smith- The Best Exotic Marigold Hotel
    Kerry Washington- Django Unchained

    -This was always a category without too much room for additional contenders, so Dowd missing was probably more expected than I initially admitted. I think she was the sixth seed though. Without any real love for ‘The Best Exotic Marigold Hotel’, it’s likely that Smith wasn’t as close to a nom as we thought, though Kidman might have been even closer…

    Best Adapted Screenplay

    Anna Karenina (Tom Stoppard)
    The Best Exotic Marigold Hotel (Ol Parker)
    Les Miserables (William Nicholson)
    The Perks of Being a Wallflower (Stephen Chbosky)
    The Sessions (Ben Lewin)

    -Voters weren’t as in love with ‘Les Miserables’ as some expected them to be, but even so it likely came close to a nomination. The same can be said for ‘The Perks of Being a Wallflower’, which sadly wound up getting completely shut out. This was a top heavy category, perhaps even more so than many of the others.

    Best Original Screenplay

    Looper (Rian Johnson)
    The Master (Paul Thomas Anderson)
    Promised Land (Matt Damon, Dave Eggers, and John Krasinski)
    Seven Psychopaths (Martin McDonagh)
    Ted (Seth MacFarlane, Alec Sulkin, and Wellesley Wild)

    -I was very surprised to see ‘The Master’ left out in the cold, and to a smaller extent ‘Looper’ as well. In regards to ‘Promised Land’, it’s just unusual to see the Academy not reward favorite son Damon for attempting to pen another screenplay. As for ‘Ted’, well…if I thought it was in play for Best Picture somewhat more than most give it credit for, doesn’t Original Screenplay make even more sense?

    Overall, I think I might actually prefer the original nominees, though there are some snubs here that absolutely break my heart. I suppose the ideal lineup is somewhere in between, with some personal choices thrown in there for good measure. The dream lineup is nice to think about, but reality is reality and we’ll just make due with what we have. I turn things over to you now, ladies and gentlemen…which films and performances do you feel just missed the cut for Oscar nominations? How close do you think I got to the Academy’s near miss choices? Am I completely off of the mark? I’m very curious to get your take on this, so have at it!

    -Thoughts? Discuss in the comments!

    About Joey Magidson


    When he’s not obsessing over new Oscar predictions on a weekly basis, Joey is seeing between 200 and 300 movies a year. He views the best in order to properly analyze the awards race/season each year, but he also watches the worst for reasons he mostly sums up as "so you all don't have to". In his spare time, you can usually find him complaining about the Jets or the Mets. Still, he lives and dies by film. Joey's a voting member of the Internet Film Critics Association as well. Today the IFCA, tomorrow the world!

    Related Stories:


    Comments: 23 Comments |

    23 Comments

    1. This is a fun idea, and hard to disagree with too much of what you chose.

        (Quote)  (Reply)

      share

       

    2. The lineups have looked like more fun in year’s past, but this year it’s a little more businesslike. Not that that’s a bad thing, it just is what it is…

        (Quote)  (Reply)

      share

       

    3. If it weren’t for the fact that in previous years we have often been scrounging around for five people or films to honor, this year has been so good that you almost wish all the categories (or at least the top five) could be expanded to a sliding scale with maximum of ten.

      Looking at your lists, there are at least two or three that made me say, “Yes, that one deserved the nomination if not the award”.

        (Quote)  (Reply)

      share

       

    4. How does The Dark Knight Rises get snubbed again? I feel like it would be on the alternative list.

        (Quote)  (Reply)

      share

       

      • If it didn’t even score a tech nod, I have my doubts it would have cracked the next line of Best Picture nominees, and personally I love that film…

          (Quote)  (Reply)

        share

         

    5. Honestly, the alternate Original Screenplay category is about as good as the one we got. Ditto for Supporting Actor (Hoffman and Waltz aside). As for Adapted Screenplay…I think that just shows what a weak year it was for this category (the script for Anna Karenina is one of the worst things Tom Stoppard ever wrote). I haven’t seen Perks of Being a Wallflower, but I bet it deserved a nomination more than, say, Life of Pi.

      I’d like to see someone do this for the tech categories. That would be a fun experiment.

        (Quote)  (Reply)

      share

       

    6. I think you pretty much hit the mark. I think the Best Director and Best Supporting Actor lineups you put here are probably better overall than the one the Academy selected. The only differences I would say are Judi Dench for Skyfall in supporting actress (over Reilly and Washington at least) and maybe Paul Thomas Anderson over Zemeckis. I can’t see how Zemeckis could be one of the top 10 directors for just a barely above average film. But, then again, I thought Life of Pi was very mediocre so go figure.

        (Quote)  (Reply)

      share

       

    7. in your sick,creepy perverted world “ted” would have became best picture and best director seth macfarlane best director.

        (Quote)  (Reply)

      share

       

    8. At least Anderson would have had a shot in this lineup. Would have loved to see Bigelow and PTA face off. And this year I wouldn’t have minded her winning at all :(

        (Quote)  (Reply)

      share

       

    9. Don’t want to sound like a douchebag, but is this list going to make any sort of difference at all to the Oscar nomination line-up? The only intention of making this list seems to be to satisfy a desire of seeing Affleck & Bigelow being named in SOME kind of list, immaterial of whether it really matters or not. Those two are NOT the first people on the planet to get snubbed for a nomination, nor will they be the last. I mean, why doesn’t anyone feel ever sorry for Christopher Nolan?

      And Joey, no matter how many times you may imply ‘Tom Hooper sucks’ (and whatever words you may use for it), the film is going to remain as it is. It’s not as if the entire film can be redone simply because some aspects of it were bad. Even I think that ‘Les Mis’ has many flaws. But to say it over and over and over again like a broken audio tape? Honestly? Too much time at your disposal, I guess? No other work to do?

      Just get over it, okay?

        (Quote)  (Reply)

      share

       

      • Considering the nominations were already announced, why would I expect to impact the race?

        Also, considering Les Miserables is the first thing Tom Hooper’s done that I haven’t given a positive review to, I’d hardly say my issues with his most recent effort indicate that I’m just sitting around all day planning how to ruin his day…

          (Quote)  (Reply)

        share

         

    10. Well congrats, you do sound like a douchebag. Just because you didn’t like an article doesn’t mean it was pointless. These probably were the nominations next in line. And with Tom Hooper, Joey was pointing out that he thought he was next in line despite not liking his direction. So nice job, you’re a dick.

        (Quote)  (Reply)

      share

       

      • No worries, everyone is entitled to disagree with anything I write. Ideally, they’d go about it differently, but it is what it is…

          (Quote)  (Reply)

        share

         

    11. Super interesting!

        (Quote)  (Reply)

      share

       


    Comments RSS

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


    5 + = eleven

    You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>



    © Copyright 2008-2012 AwardsCircuit.com - All rights reserved.


    Disclaimer: AwardsCircuit.com is a private, independently owned site which is intended only as entertainment. The views expressed on this website may or may not reflect those of its owner.