
“I am a star. I’m a star, I’m a star, I’m a star. I am a big, bright, shining star. That’s right.”
With this ending pep talk, Dirk Diggler reclaims his rightful place in the limelight as Paul Thomas Anderson burgeons onto the scene as a formidable filmmaking talent. Since Boogie Nights took critics and viewers by surprise and effectively cemented itself as his breakout film, Anderson has trickled out a handful of films, all of which he’s written and directed. A self-taught student of the art, he’s come into his own as a modern American auteur in the vein of Stanley Kubrick and Orson Welles before him. Taking pride in generating a truly original narrative (all of his six films are based on his original screenplays with the exception of the loose adaptation that drives There Will Be Blood), Anderson is of the lesser-populated writer-director breed in the species of film-helmers in Hollywood.
Born in Studio City, CA, Anderson was exposed to the entertainment industry from an early age, picking up his first camera at the age of twelve. In his senior year in high school, he debuted his first production, a short film called The Dirk Diggler Story (1988), which he would later famously adapt into his breakout film.
His first feature production, Hard Eight (1996), screened at Cannes Film Festival in 1996 and the critical acclaim it garnered launched his career to the imminent success of Boogie Nights in 1997. The film earned Anderson his first Oscar nomination for Best Original Screenplay, as well as Supporting Actor and Actress noms for Burt Reynolds in his comeback and Julianne Moore as her breakout role, as well as notice for a young Mark Wahlberg. With the success of Boogie Nights, New Line Cinema, who distributed the film, gave Anderson free reign on his next project, leading to the creation of Magnolia (1999), the film he famously considers, ” for better or worse, the best movie I’ll ever make.” The Academy, once again, noted Anderson’s screenwriting merits in another Original Screenplay nomination, as well as a Supporting Actor nod for the phenomenal Tom Cruise and Aimee Mann for Original Song. Anderson would be absent from the big
screen for nearly a decade before a tour de force spectacle in 2007′s There Will Be Blood, earning seven nominations, including Adapted Screenplay and his first as director, ultimately winning two by night’s end. Another five years in the making and the confounding The Master (2012) graced the big screen to a torrent of critical acclaim, with the puzzling exclusion this awards season of nominations for directing and screenwriting, but more on that blasphemy later.
Studying his repertoire of stories, Anderson shows a penchant for compelling character studies. Early in his career, he hits a high note with the genius that is Dirk Diggler. Played to perfection by Mark Wahlberg, Diggler’s a sweet kid whose rise to adult stardom brings him fame, riches, and to the edge of self-destruction. In contrast with the turn he takes in later works, Anderson offers his troubled young stud a happy ending.
A little less so, but still faintly evocative of hope is Magnolia when his troubled, universe-colliding characters participate in an epiphanous musical number of Aimee Mann’s “Wise Up.” Despite the setbacks and generally somber hue, there is an inkling of closure, reform, and redemption which seeps through the cracks of the characters’ broken lives. It also features some his best writing in Tom Cruise’s unforgettable “Seduce and Destroy” seminars.
Anderson’s current evolutionary stage seems to be in the realm of the ambiguous anti-hero. In his two latest films, he opts for two period pieces operating, respectively, in the context of budding venture capitalism and a spiritual awakening. He tackles prickly, abrasive characters of the misanthropic or otherwise socially maladjusted variety, crafting fascinating, and often disturbing, human studies that are philosophically or morally ambiguous.
There Will Be Blood and even The Master follow an arc reminiscent of Kubrick’s Barry Lyndon, one of the late master-director’s less-appreciated works, some considering it to be the product of a bored man. Yes, it’s long but the classic rise and fall trope is so intricately constructed that it’s impossible not to marvel at the craftsmanship. Similarly, Anderson presents the protagonists in his most recent films in a seemingly progressive ascension, but leaves them at a place that’s not explicitly pictured as demise. Daniel Plainview arrogantly chomping down on leathery meat before triumphing over Eli in a match of bowling with the definitive, almost taunting exclamation of “I’m finished” over the elated Brahms concerto titillating into the credits is a very fitting end for him. It doesn’t necessarily leave him in ruins, though it’s certainly debatable. In The Master, Freddie Quell’s final reversion to his old drifter ways with the added wisdom of Lancaster Dodd he’s picked up on the way isn’t rock-bottom for him, but merely affirmation of the fact that he may be obliviously beyond help.
Next up, in a quick turnaround from his usual years-long drought, PTA will be adapting Thomas Pynchon’s novel Inherent Vice, a psychedelic noir thriller–perfect pickings for the auteur. Perhaps it’ll make for a less tiresome process for the writer, but knowing him, he’ll find a way to make it live up to his signature style. Rumored to begin shooting this spring, this marks the first time a Pynchon novel–known for their denseness and complexity–receives a feature film adaptation.
And now for the bit about decrying crimes committed against one of the greatest filmmakers and screenwriters of our time. It’s an unspeakable offense beyond comprehension to have omitted Anderson from the Adapted Screenplay category at this year’s upcoming Academy Awards, and will not soon be forgotten. I feel like Princess Lucilla at the end of Gladiator standing over Maximus, ordering the soldiers to “Honor him!” (Ironically, the other body cast aside in the arena is that of Commodus, played by none other than Joaquin Phoenix, but obviously the director/writer and actor’s metaphoric awards season deaths in this scenario haven’t come by each others’ hands.) While Phoenix is used to the Academy’s cold shoulder (when it comes to actually winning), it’s uncharacteristic for PTA not to even be acknowledged when he writes and directs a film, since they’re few and far between. To date, he’s garnered five Oscar nominations, three of which attest to his writing chops, so the omission is truly a head-scratcher, especially when his is replaced by the weaker screenplay of Flight. Perhaps the Academy felt Quentin Tarantino for Django Unchained and Wes Anderson (and Roman Coppola) for Moonrise Kingdom already filled two spots with “writer writers,” and they should be acknowledged no doubt, but it’s a disservice to exclude Anderson, who’s also been known his entire career as a filmmaker who writes his own material.
With six great (mostly original) works under his belt and a new adaptation soon underway, Anderson’s career covers a complex range of narratives, each provocative and enrapturing by their own merits. Witnessing his evolution behind the camera and the proverbial typewriter is an unraveling of cinematic history worthy of honoring. PTA, you’re a star. You’re a big, bright shining star. That’s right.
What are your favorite Paul Thomas Anderson screenplays?
Related Stories:
Tags: Boogie Nights, Burt Reynolds, Inherent Vice, Joaquin Phoenix, Julianne Moore, Magnolia, mark wahlberg, Paul Thomas Anderson, The Master, There Will Be Blood, tom cruise
12 Comments












Nicole, very good article. I’m glad there is someone on Awards Circuit who agrees with me: The Master was the Best Picture of 2012. And Phoenix deserves the Best Actor award (There’s no denying how amazing DDL was in “Lincoln” but Phoenix was even better still).
PTA is, of today’s “young” filmmakers, my favorite. Shamefully, I haven’t seen all of his films yet, but I’ve seen enough to know that he is special. I was astonished when I first saw “Magnolia” and I think that is an unquestionable masterpiece, one of my favorites of all time. Tom Cruise and Moore deserved oscars for that (but especially Cruise).
Go PTA!!
moviewatcher(Quote) (Reply)
Nope, you’re not alone. I agree, The Master was the best film of 2012.
Steve Glansberg(Quote) (Reply)
You completely ignored Punch-Drunk Love, which, while not as garnered with awards nominations as his other works, is actually on par with his other efforts and features some of his most interesting directing choices. You can’t write an article on PTA and leave off this unique gem.
Tyler Pratt(Quote) (Reply)
I’m glad you pointed that out, Tyler. That was a completely inadvertent misstep. Punch-Drunk and Hard Eight are the only 2 I haven’t seen yet. CRITERION, pick those up on Blu-ray already!
Nicole Melkonian(Quote) (Reply)
I’m commenting with the disadvantage of not having seen The Master yet. It appeared and disappeared in my neighborhood in a flash to my huge disappointed. I got on the PTA bandwagon with Boogie NIghts which I found to be an exquisitely crafted film and should have done a lot better than it did (even though it did fare well). I also enjoyed There Will Be Blood but not as much as Boogie Nights. I could not sit through Punch Drunk Love which I was attracted to by PTA and Emily Watson, but I could not sit through probably due to my huge dislike of Adam Sandler. Magnolia was fascinating but left me cold, but I applaud PTA for this endeavor. I think this is a man of incredible talent reminiscent of Orson Welles whose two masterpieces Citizen Kane and The Magnificent Ambersons and the later Touch of Evil have never been equalled. Though I find PTA’s work a bit spotty after Boogie NIghts (hopefully The Master wil change my mind), I hope he stays on course and look forward to his future work.
jmlatinmaster(Quote) (Reply)
Great article about a great film maker. I actually like his three most recent screenplays best (The Master, There Will Be Blood, and Punch-Drunk Love). Magnolia is a marvelous work as well, but I’ve always thought that the “fate or coincidence” through-line didn’t live up to the promise of Ricky Jay’s opening monologue (the coincidences in Jay’s three tales were each “no way, that’s unbelievable,” but the coincidences and connections between the characters through the rest of the film were not really shocking). I’ve also always felt alienated by the love for Boogie Nights, which I certainly think is an entertaining and high quality flick, but I wasn’t inspired or provoked like I was with all of his other films. Still, regardless of personal opinion, you speak the truth. PT Anderson is one of the masters.
Best PT Anderson writing
- Magnolia – Ricky Jay’s fate or coincidence, every Tom Cruise and John C. Reilly scene
- Punch-Drunk Love – pudding for miles, lonely phone call
- There Will Be Blood – sales pitch, a competition in me, drink your milk shake
- The Master – processing, Dodd loses his temper
Steve Glansberg(Quote) (Reply)
Loved it. Almost all of PTA’s work has impressed me thus far. TWBB is one of my favorite movies ever, and The Master came in at #4 on my top 10 list. One of our finest filmmakers, to say the least.
Mark Johnson(Quote) (Reply)
TWBB is also one of my all time favorites, Mark. I’m glad you were one of the few to not cast The Master aside this year, too.
Nicole Melkonian(Quote) (Reply)
I’ve seen four of Anderson’s films (I haven’t seen HARD EIGHT or PUNCH-DRUNK LOVE, which I guess doesn’t actually exist…?), and to me, THERE WILL BE BLOOD comes out on top. It’s his purest film, sprawling without ever feeling self-indulgent (which his other films occasionally do), enigmatic without being obscure, and showcasing a performance by Daniel Day-Lewis which won him a hugely-deserved Oscar.*
THE MASTER or MAGNOLIA comes next (I only saw MAGNOLIA once, so I’m not sure): both are fascinating, rich, and thought-provoking…and a little bit on the indulgent side (MAGNOLIA in particular sags in the third hour). Still, when the performances and direction are so good–Joaquin Phoenix may never top his work here–one can forgive a lot.
BOOGIE NIGHTS left me a little underwhelmed, mostly because I couldn’t tell if it wanted to be a goofy comedy or a serious look at an absurd subculture. It was a good movie, and probably on second viewing I would appreciate it more, but I didn’t quite see what the fuss was about.
I’m hugely excited for INHERENT VICE; I need to read the book beforehand, but I hope this kicks off adaptations of other Pynchon works…how cool would a GRAVITY’S RAINBOW film be?
* – Coincidentally, he’ll probably beat out Joaquin Phoenix–and by extension, his old collaborator–for a less-deserving performance.
JamDenTel(Quote) (Reply)
Paul Thomas Anderson is one of my all time favorite filmmakers. He is tremendous at what he does, especially with how he creates these unique character studies that feel so ambitious in the way he is able to craft the material. My favorite of his has to be “There Will Be Blood”. There is so much packed into that film that even with so many repeated viewing later, I’m still discovering little bits that I didn’t notice before. Second would probably be “Boogie Nights” if only because it’s so exuberant and entertaining.
Josh P.(Quote) (Reply)
Perfect choice to start off the series. If Tarantino can make it in for a bloated script and, bleh, Flight makes it into a five, why couldn’t The Master? Oh well, next time. Looking forward to Inherent Vice (more so when Robert Downey Jr. was attached) and what it could be alongside the other movies he’s done. I think The Master just came out too early in the season and lost steam. With the ZDT controversy that showed up…maybe it could’ve bounced back.
PTA’s right when he says Magnolia is his masterpiece. It’s a kitchen sink approach that works. Even the frogs. When you can take something so personal (the father/son story with Jason Robards dying of cancer specifically) and it affects your audience, you have succeeded. As great as the others are, Magnolia, for better or worse, has it all.
steve(Quote) (Reply)
Paul Thomas Anderson is the best writer of his generation, while his characters aren’t always the most likable, they are three dimensional well developed characters that go on a cinematic journey. Characters that confront their inner weaknesses as the narrative progresses. PTA’s best films are Magnolia and There Will Be Blood for me, two astonishing achievements in filmmaking. TWWB is my favorite film of all time, really. Boogie Nights, PDL and Sydney/Hard Eight come close.
That being said, I just saw The Master a couple of days ago and I find myself still thinking about it. It’s the most thought provoking and well acted film of the year, that’s for sure, it’s raw, animalistic, primal in every sense. However, there WAS NO NARRATIVE DRIVE to the film. It was simply a series of scenes put together. After Master meets Freddie on the boat. The narrative does not enhance. The characters don’t go through a cinematic journey. It felt more like a “life and times of” movie than anything else. However, I’m somehow still enchanted by this screenwriting decision. It makes the movie more of a character study, almost like a portrait of those turbulent times. The other artistic medium that this movie could be compared to is a painting. Majestic, raw, timeless, beautiful, yet stuck in that exact same spot, it doesn’t change.
A majestic, riveting, raw film yet creature of it’s own that may be too foreign for it’s time. It stamps over regular Hollywood conventions of narrative and has created a language of it’s own. It’s almost groundbreaking. WOW, this is long!! Haha. I needed to get this out there. It just goes to show what an effect this movie has on a viewer. Well done PTA!
Fareezo(Quote) (Reply)