The Tarantino Effect – When Will Oscar See Him as a Director, Not a Writer

Boal vs. Tarantino Redux with a possible different outcome but why hasn’t Oscar jumped for Tarantino fully yet…?

Boal_TarantinoWith all the craziness of awards season, I hadn’t fully noticed the big story circulating among the writers branch that the two great screenwriters Mark Boal and Quentin Tarantino were squaring off in the Original Screenplay category once again.  The last time the two dueled was in 2009 when Boal’s The Hurt Locker triumphed over Tarantino’s Inglourious Basterds.

In the 2009 season, many had assumed it was a no-brainer that Boal would emerge the victor after winning the Writers Guild of America Award and after the impressive showing the film had with the major guilds.  Tarantino’s Inglourious Basterds, though an audience favorite, had to settle with Christoph Waltz being the sole representation for the film in Oscar’s Supporting Actor category.  Coincidentally, Waltz is nominated again this year for his performance in Django Unchained.

As Zero Dark Thirty continues to get pummeled by outspoken Oscar voters, and looks to be a likely unrewarded film in any category on Oscar night, Tarantino’s film has emerged as a likely candidate to win Original Screenplay and Supporting Actor.  While the film as a whole won’t be as successful, or have the same outcome, as Bigelow’s first Oscar-winning film, Tarantino has yet to have one of his films go “all the way.”  Call it poor timing when another film just a tad better captures the cultural zeitgeist in a way that seems to overthrow Tarantino’s film, or it could simply be that the Academy doesn’t love Tarantino THAT much.

tarantino_oscarTarantino’s first dance with Oscar for Pulp Fiction (1994) was a massive hit on both critical and audience fronts.  The film won the Palme d’Or at the prestigious Cannes Film Festival, captured dozens of citations from the nation’s top critics as the Best Film of the Year, and grossed over $100 million dollars at the box office.  The film was released October 1994 and grossed $9 million in its opening weekend.  Unfortunately, earlier in the summer of 1994, Robert Zemeckis released his epic Forrest Gump, starring fresh off his first Oscar win Tom Hanks.  Hanks would receive universal acclaim along with co-stars Gary Sinise, Sally Field, and Robin Wright.  The film garnered 13 Academy Award Nominations and $329 million at the box office, while Pulp Fiction’s impressive, but modest, funds only managed seven nominations.

It was, perhaps, his  best shot to catch Oscar’s big one. Over the next fifteen years, Tarantino released five films that were virtually ignored by Oscar.  Jackie Brown (1997) only managed a Supporting Actor nomination for veteran actor Robert Forster.  Both the lead, Pam Grier, and Quentin Tarantino were given the shaft and went unnoticed.

His revenge, two-part thriller Kill Bill Vol. 1 (2003) and Kill Bill Vol. 2 (2004) grossed a combined total of over $130 million dollars. It had a score of 85% and 84%, respectively, on Rotten Tomatoes, and was a fan favorite.  Vol. 1 only received one major award mention during its year. Uma Thurman for Best Actress in a Drama at the Golden Globe Awards.

Vol. 2 was perhaps closer to Oscar than its predecessor, scoring Golden Globe nominations for Uma Thurman and David Carradine and a Critics Choice nomination for Thurman.  Both would ultimately fail to gain recognition in the end.  Despite being one of Tarantino’s most entertaining, and most cleverly written features, Kill Bill received no love from critics and received no recognition from AMPAS members for either Tarantino’s writing or directing efforts.

Grindhouse (2007), the co-directed Robert Rodriguez double feature (Planet TerrorDeath Proof), had more people split on the director’s abilities and tastes than ever before. I personally found the film to be Tarantino’s worst effort – partly because there were too many hands in the pot from writing and directing standpoints. Grindhouse was ignored by both critics and audiences and grossed just under $25 million dollars at the box office.

Inglourious Basterds would revitalize Tarantino’s career and gain him a new legion of followers, not only within the fanboy community, but also on the Academy front.  Django Unchained, though clearly problematic in places, returns the writer/director to the Oscar ceremony to fight it out for his second Oscar.  Many think he’s owed after losing to Boal for his work on Basterds. Some think Django is one of the writer’s finest moments in cinema thus far, but no matter what the outcome, Tarantino has a lot to live up to for his next effort.

markboal_oscarThough Mark Boal’s resume on the cinematic front isn’t as deep as Mr. Tarantino’s, his other penned effort, Paul Haggis’s In the Valley of Elah (2007), did get an Oscar nomination for Best Actor for Oscar winner Tommy Lee Jones.  As it stands today, all three of Boal’s screenplays have garnered one acting nomination each.  That’s a good track record for a “rookie” writer/producer.  Waltz is the only rewarded actor from a Tarantino picture however, distributed by the Weinstein Company, the Oscar experts have had at least one actor winning the Academy Awards in the past four years.  This year TWC has Waltz for Django, Jennifer Lawrence, Bradley Cooper, Robert DeNiro,  and Jacki Weaver for Silver Linings Playbook, and Joaquin Phoenix, Philip Seymour Hoffman, and Amy Adams for The Master.  One of those eight talented actors are bound to win.

In the end, Boal and Tarantino may both end up losing to foreign auteur writer/director Michael Haneke, whose film, Amour, scored five nominations, including Picture, Director, and Lead Actress. I’m expecting this outcome for Haneke who still remains Oscar-less despite an impressive resume that includes The White Ribbon and Cache.  He just might have the legs to top both the writers who have won Oscars before.  I believe Tarantino is one or two films away from winning an Oscar for Directing and even Motion Picture of the Year.

Tarantino is reportedly working on a third installment to Kill Bill but this has yet to be confirmed and was denied a few months back at Comic-Con though there are fanboys praying currently for its existence.  iMDB still has it as announced.  Mark Boal has no pending projects as of yet.


What do you think?

393 points
Upvote Downvote
Binge Watcher

Written by Clayton Davis

Clayton Davis is the esteemed Editor and Owner of Born in Bronx, NY to a Puerto Rican mother and Black father, he’s been criticizing film and television for over a decade. Clayton is a member of the Broadcast Film Critics Association where he votes and attends the kick off to the awards season, the Critics Choice Awards. He also founded the Latino Entertainment Journalists Association, the first Latino-based critics’ organization in the United States. He’s also an active member of the African-American Film Critics Association, New York Film Critics Online, International Press Academy, Black Reel Awards, and the Broadcast Television Journalists Association. Clayton has been quoted and appeared in various outlets that include The New York Times,, Variety, Deadline, Los Angeles Times, FOX 5, Bloomberg Television, AOL, Huffington Post, Bloomberg Radio, The Wrap, Slash Film, and the Hollywood Reporter.


Notify of

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

IMHO, of the nominees, tarantino should have won Screenplay for inglorious basterds (along with picture and directing and supp. actor) in 2009 and boal should win this year for screenplay (among the nominees, cause PTA wrote the best orig. Script of 2012). Since boal’s already won, in terms of oscar politics, I’m rooting for tarantino to pull this off. The man’s a genius after all…

Josh P.

I wasn’t a huge fan of “Inglourious Basterds”, but I would have preferred Tarantino winning the Oscar over Boal that year. For me, the biggest flaw of “The Hurt Locker” was the story, and to see him win for that felt more like a general sweep for the film itself. It’s ironic that this year, Mark Boal delivered a fantastic screenplay in “Zero Dark Thirty”, and he would be my preferred winner, but he might end up losing to Tarantino for a screenplay I didn’t think was as worthy. Funny how things turn out. On that note, I am predicting… Read more »

Joey Magidson

I have a theory that I’m toying with which suggests Tarantino is a film or two away from winning it all. Still developing it a bit more and marinating on it, but once the Oscars are over I’ll spring it on everyone…


Inglourious Basterds is a film I love dearly, so naturally I felt it should have beaten out The Hurt Locker,especially in the writing department, since I found Boal’s script to be fairly unremarkable. (That same night, In the Loop, another film I adore, lost Adapted Screenplay to Precious, which might be an even more egregious error). This time, the playing field is a touch more level. Django isn’t quite as good as IB, and ZD30 is, I’d say, better than Hurt Locker, especially in the writing department. I still would rather see Django (or Amour) win, especially since I don’t… Read more »

Rohit Ramachandran

Really nice write-up. Tarantino deserves it, definitely. It’s a pity so much of great stuff was cut out of the film but the script is fuckin’ gold. It’s his to lose.

Jeremy DC

I guess I’m in agreement with everyone else. I thought The Hurt Locker was a better movie than Inglourious Basterds but Tarantino definitely should have won original screenplay over Boal. This year I think Boal should win screenplay over Tarantino but there really is no doubt in my mind that Tarantino will win. I really hate oscar politics. Is it so hard to vote for who you think did the best job? Tarantino will ultimately have director and picture awards and it will more than likely be for a movie that isn’t as good as Pulp Fiction or Inglourious Basterds.… Read more »



2013 Writers Guild of America Preview

Taking Questions for Final Power Hour Before Oscar Ceremony!